Try Practice Fusion’s free EHR
Calling All VCs, Entrepreneurs, Developers, and HIT devotees: Submit Public Comments on the Future Regulation of Health IT.
As health IT has evolved to address the challenges and opportunities in healthcare delivery, questions about patient safety, risk, and quality of technology have likewise emerged. So too, the ability of innovation in health IT to improve healthcare and the patient experience has been highlighted.
In order to balance those concerns with the continued promotion of innovation while avoiding regulatory confusion, Congress passed legislation that charged the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct an 18-month study in partnership with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) to develop a risk-based regulatory framework for health IT.
As a result of that legislation, the FDA Safety and Innovation Act or FDASIA (pronounced “Fah-Day-Jah”), the three agencies convened a workgroup within the HIT Policy Committee to gain feedback from diverse stakeholders in the industry. The nearly 30 members represent EHR and mobile app developers, academic researchers, venture capitalists, health systems, legal and FDA experts, and providers and patients. The workgroup has established three subgroups—Taxonomy, Innovation and Risk Assessment, and Regulations—and will produce recommendations to advise the agencies’ report by August 2013.
To augment the feedback provided by the workgroup, a request for public comment (RFC) has been published to the Federal Register by the agencies. While the RFC will remain on the Federal Register until August 31, 2013, comments submitted by June 30, 2013 will be taken into account by the workgroup and are highly encouraged. You can join upcoming meetings of the FDASIA workgroup by going here and you can submit comments online at http://www.regulations.gov.
For first-time commenters, here are a few pointers:
- Address the document to the ONC (Attn: Steve Posnack) and reference the title of the rule
- Identify yourself /your organization, who/what you are and any relevant interests you represent (e.g. “we provide technology to doctors”), and why you are commenting (e.g. “experience developing x” or “experience with y regulatory process”)
- Comments are public, so make sure you are comfortable with the content being widely available
- You can respond to the specific questions posed in the RFC and/or provide additional feedback structured as you choose
- Highlight ideas that you support as well as ideas that you oppose
- Provide as many specific examples, real world insights, or data points as you can to support your opinions
- Include details that the government may have little to no insight into:
- Your processes, your challenges and opportunities, your experiences with government and understanding the regulatory process,
- The impact of regulation or lack thereof,
- How you think about developing/investing/policy-making,
- What innovation means to you and how to promote it, what risk means to you and how you mitigate it
- How you interact with providers and consumers, feedback you’ve received from them
- New ideas for regulation, non-regulatory pathways
Your feedback is incredibly important to inform the future of health IT regulation! Don’t be intimidated by the process and if you need help, you can always reach out to me @laurenfifield on Twitter or by commenting on this post.
A special message from Practice Fusion CEO Ryan Howard This Election Day, a vote in California will have major implications for health across America. This proposed law, Proposition 37, will mandate the labeling of foods with genetically engineered ingredients and prevent companies from marketing them as “natural”. It’s a specific push for a simple label requirement in a single state. But it’s also a referendum on whether key food and health issues are considered important enough to be a part… read more >
Although Halloween means many things to kids–ghosts and ghouls, costumes and scary stories of witches and goblins–most of all, Halloween means candy. However, the prevalence of obesity and related diseases in US children means that this year, Halloween is scarier than ever. Data from Practice Fusion’s Research Division indicates that 21 percent of children are obese and another 16.5 percent are overweight. An alarming number of children are also diabetic or show signs of pre-diabetes, so it might be a… read more >
There’s been a lot of speculation about what will happen to the Affordable Care Act (ACA)–commonly referred to as a Obamacare–if Mitt Romney is elected in November. Although Mr. Romney has repeatedly promised to repeal the ACA on day one of his Presidency, the reality is that no President has the power overturn a law without Congressional support. Since he’s unlikely to garner the necessary support, ACA is pretty much a done deal. In light of this, physicians should be… read more >
Every few months, a debate over the consequences—positive, negative, neutral—of health information technology (HIT) use is waged by academics, doctors, vendors, and policymakers. The blogo-Op-Ed-twitter universe gets bombarded with opinions and data that run the gamut. The past few weeks have been host to the latest round of stories related to the impact of electronic health records (EHRs) on the delivery of health care. The New York Times published an editorial, Abuse of Electronic Health Records regarding the potential for… read more >
Practice Fusion and our partner Kaggle – a company that hosts data prediction competitions – are pleased to announce the winner of the Analyze This! 2012 – Open Challenge: Datalanche, Inc. The competition required participants to mash up public data (from http://www.data.gov/) with a set of 10,000 de-identified, HIPAA-compliant medical records provided by Practice Fusion. Datalanche leveraged the Practice Fusion data set to create a beautiful search engine tool that provides insights about medications and diseases. Type “asthma” into Datalanche… read more >